Listening to continued in case to recall board chairwoman – The Suffolk Information-Herald

A show-cause listening to scheduled for Friday morning in Suffolk Circuit Court relating to a citizen effort to recall School Board Chairwoman Dr. Judith Brooks-Buck was continued.

No new date had been set as of Friday afternoon.

The petition, which has greater than 800 signatures, was filed April 12 by Margaret Rankin of the group Suffolk Citizens for Accountability, with a show-cause order issued two days later.

The show-cause order requires Brooks-Buck to “appear before this court … to show cause, if any can, why Dr. Judith Brooks-Buck should not be removed from the office of City of Suffolk School Board for the Nansemond Borough.”

It alleges that Brooks-Buck “has knowingly, willingly and purposefully violated the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, and allowed the City of Suffolk School Board to do the same, on repeated occasions,” and in addition “repeatedly silenced any critic” of the board and the varsity division, “including threatening the removal and arrest of citizens exercising their Constitutional rights as School Board members.”

The petition additionally alleges that Brooks-Buck has censored and restricted different board members from questioning her actions, and “has deflected her own responsibility for the School Board’s failures.”

Brooks-Buck has publicly defended herself in opposition to the recall effort. At the listening to, Brooks-Buck may also have the precise to demand a jury trial within the matter. Recall petitions in Virginia don’t routinely lead to a brand new election, however relatively go to a decide to rule on the deserves of their claims. The decide will resolve whether or not to proceed with a trial.

State regulation permits for a circuit court docket, upon petition, to take away any elected official, or somebody appointed to fill an elective workplace for a number of causes, together with neglect of responsibility, misuse of workplace or incompetence within the efficiency of duties when it “has a material adverse effect upon the conduct of the office;” a misdemeanor drug conviction, a misdemeanor hate crime conviction or a misdemeanor sexual battery conviction.

The petition should be signed by no less than 10% of the entire variety of votes forged within the final election held by the individual being recalled.

Circuit Court Judge Matthew Glassman has recused himself from listening to the case. Carl Eason Jr., chief decide of the Fifth Judicial District, has designated Lawson Wayne Farmer, one other Fifth Circuit decide, to conduct all of the hearings within the case. Eason himself lately dismissed a petition to recall Isle of Wight School Board member Michael Vines.

According to on-line court docket information, Brooks-Buck will likely be represented by lawyer Melissa Y. York, and Hampton Commonwealth’s Attorney Anton Bell will likely be representing the petitioner within the case.

The outcomes of the trial might be appealed to the state Supreme Court.


Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.