Business

Warehouse employee says Amazon promised to move considerations to Bezos, violating labor legislation


An Amazon.com employee says a marketing consultant employed to defeat a union marketing campaign at an organization warehouse in New York promised to take her office considerations to Jeff Bezos – a possible violation of U.S. labor legislation.

During a National Labor Relations Board listening to Thursday, Natalie Monarrez testified that she had a 45-minute dialog in May 2021 with Bradley Moss, a labor marketing consultant who she mentioned launched himself as an Amazon auditor.

Moss requested her to checklist her considerations and mentioned his boss “had direct ties to Jeff Bezos and would be relaying all of my concerns and issues” to the Amazon founder, Monarrez mentioned.

Monarrez additionally mentioned it was the primary time throughout her 5 years at Amazon that administration had requested her to explain work-related issues.

U.S. labor legislation restricts corporations from promising new perks to staff in the event that they reject unionization or implying that their considerations can be fastened in the event that they don’t unionize.

An NLRB choose is contemplating a criticism introduced by the labor board’s basic counsel accusing Amazon of interfering with staff’ rights on the Staten Island warehouse the place staff lately voted to unionize, and firing an activist for organizing at one other close by facility.

The criticism says that final 12 months Amazon illegally coerced staff in quite a few methods, together with by prohibiting them from distributing union literature and telling workers that organizing efforts would fail as a result of the union organizers have been “thugs.”

The criticism additionally says the corporate requested staff to disclose their office grievances and promised to repair them in the event that they rejected unionization.

The case is certainly one of a number of involving the Staten Island warehouse being pursued by the company’s prosecutors.

Amazon has denied wrongdoing.

“These allegations are without merit and we look forward to presenting the facts,” firm spokesperson Kelly Nantel mentioned by way of e-mail initially of the listening to.

“Unless a company has a pre-existing practice of soliciting grievances, beginning to do so during a union organizing campaign and promising to fix the grievances is coercive, in that it tells employees that they don’t need a union to address their issues,” former NLRB Chair Wilma Liebman, who led the company underneath President Barack Obama, mentioned in an e-mail final week.

Labor board judges’ rulings could be appealed to NLRB members in Washington and from there to federal courtroom.

The company has no authority to impose punitive damages, however can require different treatments corresponding to posting of notices and reversals of insurance policies or punishments.

In the case now earlier than a choose, the labor board’s basic counsel Jennifer Abruzzo is searching for an order requiring Amazon to learn a message to staff about their rights, publish it electronically and in areas together with rest room stalls.

She’s additionally asking the choose to require necessary coaching about staff’ rights for Amazon’s managers and its exterior anti-union consultants.

Amazon has challenged the Amazon Labor Union’s April election win on the Staten Island warehouse, which was the primary time organized labor has gained a foothold at one of many e-commerce big’s US. amenities.

Amazon claims the union broke election guidelines and that the NLRB violated its obligation to be neutral, together with by suing for a federal courtroom injunction to reinstate one other activist the company alleges was illegally fired there.

Abruzzo, appointed by President Joe Biden, dismissed that allegation in an interview final month.

“But for Amazon’s unlawful labor practice,” she mentioned, “we would not have had to go into district court to seek an injunction.”



Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.